Talk:Adidas Superstar
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-04-03. The result of the discussion was keep. |
popular culture section & differences between the superstar and superstar II
[edit]The popular culture section is excessively long and should be trimmed down IMO. More important areas such as the B-Boy and hip-hop/Run DMC association with the shoe should be highligted.
It would also be useful to have a section detailing the differences between the Superstar and the Superstar II Climp + on + on (talk) 12:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Post about the 35th anniversary series Meego2 (talk) 06:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't want to blanket delete it without checking but that link at the bottom "trendsdepot" im pretty sure is a site selling fake sneakers. Adidas superstar 35th anniversaries for £50 = warning lights imo.
Superstar Vulcano
[edit]I bought a pair of Adidas Superstar Vulcanos recently. I did some research, and it's a Superstar adapted for walking more than basketball, and there isn't an article. Should we add it to the list of variations? Thanks, BlackSabbath1996 (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
????
[edit]The new versions are vastly inferior to the classics as the soft textile lining has been replaced with hard mesh. This has reduced comfort for the wearer and results in an inferior shoe.
I don't really think this is necessary IMO. It seems like OR to me, and seems like it was taken from a review from Amazon or Zappos. I'm gonna remove it from the article.
the really annoying thing is that the vast majority of new superstars do not have the sponge flat tongue like the originals - its very hard to find anything like the originals now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.104.252 (talk) 03:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adidas Superstar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207123636/http://www.press.adidas.com/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-70/96_read-966/ to http://www.press.adidas.com/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-70/96_read-966/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828074950/http://www.press.adidas.com/DesktopDefault.aspx/tabid-70/96_read-312/ to http://www.press.adidas.com/DesktopDefault.aspx/tabid-70/96_read-312/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)